Over a decade ago, “Learning Reconsidered” boldly redefined learning to be an integration of academic learning and student development (Keeling, 2004). Putting this integration into practice and moving career education from a reactive service offering to a proactive and critical part of a student’s academic experience, has long been gaining momentum.
The process to getting there however, is never a straightforward route. Like many PSEs today, Ryerson was grappling with how to respond to the increasing call for career education to reflect the needs of today’s ‘talent economy’. Following three years of consultation with students, alumni, faculty, and employers, the feedback was not unique but resoundingly clear: We serve those who come to us very well, but our entire student populations was vastly underserved.
To successfully combat this reality, postsecondary career education cannot be delivered by the Career Centre alone, it needs to build on Keeling’s vision of integration if we want to move towards the balance of our efforts being focused on proactive programming to equip students for the world of work, versus reactive services such as the proverbial first advisor appointment occurring in a student’s final year of study.
At Ryerson, we began with evolving our working model into a ‘hub and spoke’ approach, commonly found both in business schools and across PSEs in the UK. Here, each career professional is aligned to a specific Faculty or program, giving academic leadership a dedicated career education professional to tap into. To ensure both Careers and Faculty are on the same page, ahead of each academic year, the Career Consultant agrees with Faculty leadership on the strategic goals and meets with Program Directors and Chairs to understand specific, on-the-ground needs. The result is a Faculty Career Development Program (CDP), with tailored sessions delivered alongside each program and year of study.
The ability to reach each dedicated program population is of course dependent on resource, we began with one individual per Faculty, others may have further resources to hand. Over a two year period, the dedicated Faculty link expanded to also include a dedicated employer engagement counterpart, who was steeped in the knowledge of the labour markets most commonly associated with the respective programs of study. Now weaving a campus recruitment strategy into career advisory, the Career Centre had evolved to a ‘Faculty Labour Market’ (FLM) team for each Faculty.
Taking the approach that each Faculty is a client, and the Career Centre its consultant, has over a four year period, enabled us to begin moving into the curriculum with credit and non-credit bearing pilots being launched across the full STEAM spectrum of academic programming. Indeed, as we achieved more in-class time to deliver Career Education, it became more apparent to our team that we needed to enhance and expand our offerings for greater student success. To this end, we developed a Career Education Curriculum.
Converting Workshop Content to Curriculum
In our diversified and globalized workforce, digital literacy, communication, adaptability, emotional intelligence and teamwork are consistently touted as some of the key competencies students need to succeed. What, then, is the responsibility of Career Centres in informing and developing curriculum to ensure our students are ready and able to navigate their professional journeys?
Our response to the research as well as feedback from employers, alumni, students and faculty, has been to develop a comprehensive Career Education Curriculum. The purpose and aim is to develop students’ competencies and agency to not only obtain employment but to thrive in their career. To do this, we developed a research-based framework that includes 10 core competencies and a career cycle. Having reviewed current research regarding which competencies are in highest demand, we chose 10 that most consistently appeared across the literature. Additionally, reviewing student development theory, career development theory and critical theory, we developed a career cycle that outlines 4 core phases that an individual might engage in throughout their lifetime. Together, the core competencies and the career cycle informed the development of lessons. These lessons include the core learning needed for gaining employment such as Interview, Job Search, and Resume, as well, lessons that foster success in both academic and professional spaces with content focused on teamwork, emotional intelligence, professionalism, etc.
Of course, it’s not just about relevant content, but how do we ensure that students are engaging in deep learning? How do we know if students are leaving our sessions with the knowledge, skills and attitudes we are seeking to instill?
The answers to these questions are not ground breaking. We did what educators have been doing for a very long time. We developed learning outcomes, participatory learning strategies and assessments. Essentially, we are moving away from lecture-style, information banking, to fostering active learning. This includes engaging students in case studies, problem solving, discussion, creation, etc. The idea here is to measure students learning through the assessment of artifacts they create as well as self-reported learning to inform and improve content.
Building a Career Readiness Program Pilot
As we embarked upon this journey a year ago, we presented our work to our colleagues within the Faculty of Engineering and Architectural Science. The Dean’s Office requested to engage in a collaborative pilot project to deliver the curriculum to students and evaluate students’ progress every year for 5 years after its completion.
Over 6 months we worked together to build the NEXT Career Readiness Program which launched in September 2018. This non-credit course of 10 lessons delivered via online modules and in-person classes is open to 625 students who are enrolled in their second year within the